When you compare the Oculus Quest to the Pico Neo 3 Link you can see which VR Headset is better. Let's take a look of the comparison, and see which model of VR Headset out ontop.
Based on 1 reviews
When it comes to Virtual Reality headsets, there are many options available. Two of the more popular ones on the market right now are the Oculus Quest and the Pico Neo 3 Link. Both provide a great virtual reality experience for users but there are some differences that make them stand apart from each other.
Let's start with the Oculus Quest. It offers 95° field of view and a resolution of 1600x1440 px, which is slightly lower than what you’ll find in other VR headsets on the market today but still provides an immersive experience. It also has room scale 360 tracking and uses Microsoft Windows as its operating system, making it easy to use for those who already know their way around Windows. The biggest downside to this headset is its 72 Hz refresh rate, which can be somewhat slow compared to other headsets available today.
The Pico Neo 3 Link is another option when it comes to virtual reality headsets and provides a 98° field of view along with 1832 x 1920 resolution—giving you excellent image quality while using it. It also boasts 90 Hz refresh rate so you can enjoy smooth visuals without experiencing lag or stuttering like with lower refresh rates. However, since this model uses a different operating system than the Oculus Quest (Android), there may be some difficulty if you’re not familiar with using Android devices or apps.
After using both virtual reality headsets myself I have to say that my preference leans towards the Pico Neo 3 Link due to its higher resolution and faster refresh rate – providing me with a much smoother experience when playing games or watching movies in VR compared to what I experienced with the Oculus Quest headset . The only negative aspect I would point out about this headset is its use of Android OS instead of Windows, but if you already know how to navigate around your Android device then this shouldn't pose too much trouble for most users . Ultimately, both models offer great value depending on what type of user you are; if having high-end specs isn’t essential for your needs then Oculus Quest might work better as it’s less expensive than Pico Neo 3 Link but offers adequate performance overall .
Oculus Quest | Pico Neo 3 Link | |
---|---|---|
Overview | ||
Brand | Meta | Pico |
Model Name | Quest | Neo 3 Link |
Release Date | 2019 | 242022 |
Country of Origin | United States | |
Category | Standalone VR | Standalone VR |
Battery Life | 3 h | |
Display | ||
Field of View | 95° | 98° |
Resolution | 1600 × 1440 px (per eye) | 1832x1920 |
Refresh Rate | 72 Hz | 90 Hz |
Display Type | OLED | Single LCD binocular |
Minimum Requirements | ||
Min. CPU Required | Intel i5-4590 or AMD Ryzen 5 1500X or greater | |
Min. Graphics Required | Nvidia Titan X GTX 1060 or GTX 1070 or RTX 20 series | |
Min. RAM Required | 8 GB | |
Operating Systems | Microsoft Windows | |
Sizing | ||
Weight | 571 g | 395g |
Dimensions | 190.5 x 104.14 x 114.3 mm | |
Features | ||
Room Scale? | YES | |
360 Tracking? | YES | |
Positional Tracking? | YES | |
Front Camera? | No | |
Eye Tracking? | No | |
Usable with Glasses? | YES | |
Cooling System | YES | |
Built in Headphones? | YES | |
Built in Microphone? | YES | |
Flip Visor? | YES | |
Voice Command? | YES | |
IPD Adjustment? | YES | |
Lens to Eye Adjustment? | No | |
USB? | YES | |
MicroUSB? | no | |
Display Port? | YES | |
Mini Display Port? | No | |
HDMI? | No | |
MicroSD? | No | |
Bluetooth? | YES | YES |
Wifi? | YES |