Varjo Aero vs Pimax 4K

When you compare the Varjo Aero to the Pimax 4K you can see which VR Headset is better. Let's take a look of the comparison, and see which model of VR Headset out ontop.

Pimax 4KPimax 4K


Based on 1 reviews

What VR Headset is better?

I have both the Varjo Aero and the Pimax 4K virtual reality headsets in front of me, and I am going to compare them to one another. Both of these headsets offer great features, but each has its own advantages and disadvantages.

The Varjo Aero has a resolution of 2880 x 2720 px and offers a field of view of 115°. This resolution is slightly higher than that offered by the Pimax 4K which has a resolution of 3840 × 2160 px with a field of view of 110°. The extra resolution offered by the Varjo Aero gives it an edge here; however, this also means it requires a minimum CPU requirement that’s slightly higher as well (Intel Core i5-4590 or Intel Xeon E5-1620 or AMD Ryzen 5 1500X equivalent).

The Pimax 4K does have one advantage over the Varjo Aero; its minimum graphics requirements are lower than those for the Varjo (NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960/AMD R9 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050/NVIDIA RTX A2000 or Quadro RTX 4000). Both headsets feature 360 tracking, room scale capabilities, and refresh rates of 90Hz, making them equally good choices for VR gaming experiences.

In my opinion, I prefer using the Varjo Aero headset due to its higher resolution display. Although it requires more powerful hardware specifications compared to the Pimax 4K headset, I find that it provides better overall visual quality while in use which makes my VR experience much more enjoyable. Additionally, since it uses PCVR technology rather than smartphone-based solutions like most other available headsets do today, it provides greater flexibility when connecting up other devices such as controllers etc., further enhancing your gaming sessions.

Specs comparison between the two VR Headsets

Varjo AeroPimax 4K
Model NameAero4K
Release Date211020212017
Country of OriginFinlandChina
CategoryPC VRPC VR
Field of View115°110°
Resolution2880 x 2720 px (per eye)3840 × 2160 px
Refresh Rate90 Hz90 Hz
Display TypeLCD CLPL
Minimum Requirements
Min. CPU RequiredIntel Core i5-4590, Intel Xeon E5-1620, AMD Ryzen 5 1500X equivalent or betterIntel i5
Min. Graphics RequiredNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050/2060, NVIDIA RTX A2000 or NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000Nvidia GTX 960 / AMD R9
Min. RAM Required8 GB4 GB
Operating SystemsMicrosoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows
Weight487 g + headband 230 g290 g
Dimensions300 x 200 x 170 mm179 × 90 × 87 mm
Room Scale?YES
360 Tracking?YESYES
Positional Tracking?YES
Front Camera?YES
Eye Tracking?YES
Cooling SystemYES
Built in Headphones?YES
Built in Microphone?YES
IPD Adjustment?YESYES
Lens to Eye Adjustment?YES
Display Port?YES

Other popular comparisons

Copyright 2023 © VRlitic. All Rights Reserved.