When you compare the HTC VIVE Cosmos to the HTC VIVE Pro 2 you can see which VR Headset is better. Let's take a look of the comparison, and see which model of VR Headset out ontop.
This product comparison will evaluate the two virtual reality (VR) headsets, HTC VIVE Cosmos and HTC VIVE Pro 2. Both are excellent quality headsets that offer a range of features including room scale, 360 tracking and high resolution displays. While both devices have similar features, there are several differences that set them apart.
Starting with the HTC VIVE Cosmos, this headset offers an impressive field of view of 110° as well as a resolution of 2880 × 1700 px. This combination provides users with an incredibly immersive experience that is unparalleled in its clarity and depth. Additionally, the 90 Hz refresh rate ensures smooth motion without any stuttering or lag which can ruin the VR experience. The headset also comes equipped with 6-degrees-of-freedom (6DoF) tracking which allows for precise movements within virtual environments. The biggest downside to this device is that it requires additional hardware such as base stations and controllers to function properly which adds to its cost.
Next we’ll take a look at the HTC VIVE Pro 2 which has a larger field of view of 120° as well as higher resolution 2448 × 2448 px display ensuring a sharp image without blurring or pixelation in more demanding applications such as gaming or video streaming. It also has 6DoF tracking like the Cosmos but includes internal sensors for accurate tracking without needing any external hardware components making it easier to set up than its predecessor though you still need controllers for it to function properly. On top of all this, it boasts one of highest refresh rates on the market at 120 Hz meaning virtually no lag whatsoever when using this device so motion remains very fluid throughout your experience with minimal distractions from frame drops or other visual anomalies commonly seen in cheaper headsets like nausea-inducing “screen door effect” caused by low refresh rates. However you need fairly powerful system requirements such as an Intel Core i5-4590 or AMD Ryzen 1500 processor plus Nvidia GTX 1060 graphics card if you want get full potential out of it plus Windows operating system so not everyone can make use its capabilities right away due to their limited resources
To conclude my review, I would say both headsets are great options depending on what your needs are; however overall I personally prefer HTC VIVE Pro 2 since it has higher specs including larger field view plus higher resolution along with faster refresh rate while not requiring additional setup process except buying separate controller(s). Furthermore I find its no need for extra hardware requirement really convenient making me able move around freely without having worry about tangled wires tripping me up all time unlike some other PC VR setups do require base station placed somewhere stable area rather than just plugging into port my laptop/desktop machine directly like Vive Pro does allowing me be more mobile so if someone looking best bang money then perhaps should look into purchasing this one instead - even moreso considering how much cheaper compared other PC alternatives currently available market today .
|HTC VIVE Cosmos||HTC VIVE Pro 2|
|Model Name||VIVE Cosmos||VIVE Pro 2|
|Country of Origin||Taiwan||Taiwan|
|Category||PC VR||PC VR|
|Battery Life||6 h|
|Field of View||110°||120°|
|Resolution||2880 × 1700 px||2448 × 2448 px (per eye)|
|Refresh Rate||90 Hz||120 Hz|
|Min. CPU Required||Intel Core i5-4590 or AMD Ryzen 1500 equivalent or greater|
|Min. Graphics Required||NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 or AMD Radeon RX 480 equivalent or greater|
|Min. RAM Required||8 GB|
|Operating Systems||Microsoft Windows|
|Usable with Glasses?||YES|
|Lens to Eye Adjustment?||YES||YES|
|Mini Display Port?||YES|