HTC VIVE Pro 2 vs Varjo Aero

When you compare the Varjo Aero to the HTC VIVE Pro 2 you can see which VR Headset is better. Let's take a look of the comparison, and see which model of VR Headset out ontop.

What VR Headset is better?

When it comes to virtual reality headsets, the Varjo Aero and HTC VIVE Pro 2 are two of the top-of-the-line options currently available on the market. Both offer excellent features and capabilities, so choosing between them can be difficult. After testing both headsets, I have come to some conclusions about each that may help you make your decision.

The Varjo Aero has a field of view of 115°, which is slightly lower than the 120° offered by the HTC VIVE Pro 2. While this isn’t a huge difference in terms of performance, it could be noticeable in certain situations. However, the resolution offered by the Varjo Aero (2880 x 2720 px) is higher than that offered by its rival (2448 × 2448 px). This should lead to more detailed images while playing games or watching movies on either headset.

In terms of system requirements for use, both headsets require relatively high-end computers for optimal performance. The minimum CPU requirement for each headset is Intel Core i5-4590 or AMD Ryzen 1500 equivalent or greater; however, the graphics cards needed differ slightly as do their respective operating systems – with Varjo Aero requiring Microsoft Windows and HTC VIVE Pro 2 needing SteamVR compatible with Microsoft Windows 10 .

Room scale technology is supported on both headsets which allows for full body tracking and 360 degree movements which makes gaming and watching immersive content even more enjoyable experiences. Both headsets also have refresh rates at 90 Hz for Varjo Aero and 120 Hz for HTC VIVE Pro 2 which allows them to create smooth visuals free from stuttering or lag during intense scenes in games or when watching action movies etc..

Overall, I prefer the HTC Vive Pro2 over its competitor due to its superior field of view - allowing me to enjoy an even better range of motion while using VR applications - along with its improved resolution and faster refresh rate meaning users can enjoy smoother visuals without any stuttering or lag. Additionally I find that having support from steamVR allows me a wider range of compatibility compared to using just Windows alone with my other PC hardware components making this option even better value overall.

Specs comparison between the two VR Headsets

Varjo AeroHTC VIVE Pro 2
Model NameAeroVIVE Pro 2
Release Date211020212021
Country of OriginFinlandTaiwan
CategoryPC VRPC VR
Battery Life6 h
Field of View115°120°
Resolution2880 x 2720 px (per eye)2448 × 2448 px (per eye)
Refresh Rate90 Hz120 Hz
Display TypeLCD LCD
Minimum Requirements
Min. CPU RequiredIntel Core i5-4590, Intel Xeon E5-1620, AMD Ryzen 5 1500X equivalent or betterIntel Core i5-4590 or AMD Ryzen 1500 equivalent or greater
Min. Graphics RequiredNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050/2060, NVIDIA RTX A2000 or NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 or AMD Radeon RX 480 equivalent or greater
Min. RAM Required8 GB8 GB
Operating SystemsMicrosoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows
Weight487 g + headband 230 g
Dimensions300 x 200 x 170 mm
Room Scale?YESYES
360 Tracking?YESYES
Positional Tracking?YES
Eye Tracking?YES
Usable with Glasses?YES
Cooling SystemYES
IPD Adjustment?YESYES
Lens to Eye Adjustment?YES
Display Port?YESYES
Mini Display Port?YES

Other popular comparisons

Copyright 2023 © VRlitic. All Rights Reserved.