Lenovo Explorer vs Asus HC102

When you compare the Lenovo Explorer to the Asus HC102 you can see which VR Headset is better. Let's take a look of the comparison, and see which model of VR Headset out ontop.

Asus HC102Asus HC102


Based on 2 reviews

What VR Headset is better?

I recently had the opportunity to test both the Lenovo Explorer and Asus HC102 virtual reality headsets. With both products in front of me, I was able to compare them and find out which headset offered the best overall experience.

Let's start with a breakdown of their specs. The Lenovo Explorer features a 110° field of view, 2880 × 1440 px resolution, Intel Mobile Core i5 Dual-Core with Hyperthreading processor minimum requirements, Intel HD Graphics 620 (GT2) minimum graphics requirement, Microsoft Windows operating system support, room scale 360 tracking, and 90 Hz refresh rate. On the other hand, the Asus HC102 has a slightly narrower 95° field of view but still provides an impressive 1440 × 1440 px resolution display. It also requires an Intel Core i5 4590 processor as its minimum requirement along with Microsoft Windows OS support and similarly offers 90 Hz refresh rate capabilities.

When it comes to performance features between these two VR headsets, I would say that they offer very similar experiences on paper. However when it comes down to actual usage, there are some noticeable differences between them that are worth mentioning. First off is that while the Lenovo Explorer provides superior visuals due to its larger field of view and higher resolution display compared to its counterpart – this comes at a cost of increased power consumption from its more powerful processor requirements which can be seen in its battery life performance when compared directly against the Asus HC102 headset. This means that for users looking for longer gaming sessions on either device may prefer opting for the latter due to its lower power consumption benefits despite having slightly lower graphical quality than what is provided by Lenovo’s offering – making it ideal for those who want something more portable or just want extended gaming sessions without interruption from low battery warnings popping up all over their screen.

In addition to this comparison between technical specifications is another key difference between these two devices: comfort level when worn over long periods of time by users wearing glasses or contact lenses - something important if you plan on using your VR headset extensively throughout an entire day or multiple days consecutively without taking breaks in-between uses or needing adjustments due to discomfort caused by prolonged wear during intense gaming sessions; Here again I would give preference towards using ASUS’ model as not only does it provide better breathability due to its lighter weight design but also adjustable head straps allowing users with different head sizes or eye prescriptions greater flexibility in finding their optimal fit while engaging with content within their virtual environment while reducing pressure points around their eyes which could potentially cause headaches during use like what might occur when using heavier models such as those found in Lenovo’s line-up instead - though this isn't necessarily indicative across all models within each respective brand's product lineup; so always make sure you try before buying regardless!

Ultimately my personal choice would go towards ASUS' model given how lightweight it feels on my face even after hours of wear along with providing me enough freedom through adjusting head straps according people varying shapes/sizes plus being able ease up on some visual fidelity for extended gaming session times if needed - however both brands offer great VR experiences especially since each bring something unique from one another giving consumers options depending on preference & individual needs alike; so be sure explore each before deciding what fits best into your lifestyle!

Specs comparison between the two VR Headsets

Lenovo ExplorerAsus HC102
Model NameExplorerHC102
Release Date20172018
Country of OriginChinaTaiwan
CategoryPC VRPC VR
Battery Life12 h
Field of View110°95°
Resolution2880 × 1440 px1440 × 1440 px (per eye)
Refresh Rate90 Hz90 Hz
Display TypeLCD LCD
Minimum Requirements
Min. CPU RequiredIntel Mobile Core i5 Dual-Core with HyperthreadingIntel Core i5 4590
Min. Graphics RequiredIntel HD Graphics 620 (GT2)
Min. RAM Required8 GB8 GB
Operating SystemsMicrosoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows
Weight380 g400 g
Dimensions185 × 95 × 102 mm
Room Scale?YESYES
360 Tracking?YESYES
Positional Tracking?YESYES
Front Camera?YESYES
Eye Tracking?No
Usable with Glasses?YESYES
Cooling SystemNo
Built in Headphones?No
Built in Microphone?No
Flip Visor?YES
Voice Command?YES
IPD Adjustment?YES
Lens to Eye Adjustment?YES
Display Port?YES

Other popular comparisons

Copyright 2023 © VRlitic. All Rights Reserved.