When you compare the Google Earth VR to the Oculus Go you can see which VR Headset is better. Let's take a look of the comparison, and see which model of VR Headset out ontop.
Comparing Google Earth VR and Oculus Go is a bit like comparing apples and oranges. Each headset has its own set of pros and cons that make them good choices for different types of virtual reality experiences.
Starting with Google Earth VR, the major advantage this headset has over the Oculus Go is its requirement for better hardware specs such as an Intel i5-6400 or better CPU and Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 or AMD Radeon R9 Fury equivalent or better GPU. The higher specs give users a more immersive experience with faster loading times and improved visuals. Additionally, because it’s powered by Windows, Google Earth VR offers cross-compatibility between PC’s, laptops, tablets and smartphones. A downside to this headset is that it needs to be plugged into a computer to operate properly which can restrict mobility somewhat compared to other options.
The Oculus Go offers users portability without having to worry about carrying around an expensive gaming computer since all the necessary hardware (CPU & GPU) is contained within the headset itself. This also means users don’t have to worry about compatibility issues between their device and the headset as it runs on Android OS meaning most devices will work seamlessly when paired up with this device. Another plus point for this model is that it comes equipped with Room Scale tracking for full 360 degree motion sensing capabilities in your environment along with built-in speakers for audio immersion during gameplay sessions. One minor downside could be its slightly lower refresh rate of 72 Hz compared to some of the other headsets on offer currently but despite this issue many people find no issue whatsoever playing games or viewing content on the device in virtual reality environments just fine..
In my opinion if I had to choose one between these two models I would probably go for Google Earth VR due its greater level of performance compared against what you get out of an Oculus Go model however that being said if you are looking at getting into Virtual Reality without spending too much money then undoubtedly the Oculus Go may be a great way forward given its low cost entry price point!
Google Earth VR | Oculus Go | |
---|---|---|
Overview | ||
Brand | Meta | |
Model Name | Earth VR | Go |
Release Date | 2016 | 2018 |
Country of Origin | United States | United States |
Category | PC VR | Standalone VR |
Battery Life | 2.5 h | |
Display | ||
Field of View | 101° | |
Resolution | 2560 × 1440 px | |
Refresh Rate | 72 Hz | |
Display Type | LCD | |
Minimum Requirements | ||
Min. CPU Required | Intel i5-6400 equivalent or better | Intel Core i3-6100 or AMD Ryzen 3 1200, FX4350 or greater. |
Min. Graphics Required | Nvidia GeForce GTX 970, AMD Radeon R9 Fury equivalent or better | Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050Ti or Radeon RX 470 or greater |
Min. RAM Required | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Operating Systems | Microsoft Windows | Android |
Sizing | ||
Weight | 467 g | |
Dimensions | 190 × 105 × 115 mm | |
Features | ||
Room Scale? | No | |
360 Tracking? | YES | |
Positional Tracking? | No | |
Front Camera? | YES | |
Eye Tracking? | No | |
Usable with Glasses? | YES | |
Cooling System | No | |
Built in Headphones? | YES | |
Built in Microphone? | YES | |
Flip Visor? | No | |
Voice Command? | YES | |
IPD Adjustment? | No | |
Lens to Eye Adjustment? | No | |
USB? | YES | |
MicroUSB? | No | |
Display Port? | No | |
Mini Display Port? | No | |
HDMI? | No | |
MicroSD? | YES | |
Bluetooth? | YES | |
Wifi? | YES |