When you compare the Oculus Quest 2 to the Arpara VR All In One you can see which VR Headset is better. Let's take a look of the comparison, and see which model of VR Headset out ontop.
Based on 7 reviews
Comparing two different virtual reality headsets can be difficult, but I have had the chance to personally test both the Oculus Quest 2 and the Arpara VR All In One. After spending time with each headset, I have come away with a few key takeaways.
When it comes to resolution, the Oculus Quest 2 has an 1832 x 1920 px resolution while the Arpara VR All In One boasts 2560 x 2560 px resolution. That's a major pro for Arpara as they are clearly giving users a more detailed visual experience. Additionally, Arpara's refresh rate is 90 Hz compared to 72 Hz of the Oculus Quest 2; meaning that when playing games or watching movies there will be less lag and screen tearing which makes it overall a better choice for immersive gameplay.
On the other hand, one of the advantages of having an Oculus Quest 2 is its room scale 360 tracking capabilities which allow you to move around in any space without being confined by wires or external sensors. It also contains Qualcomm Snapdragon XR2 CPU built in which gives it enough power to deliver fast performance no matter what type of game you’re playing. Another pro that many people look for in their headsets is field of view and here both do fairly well with 97° FOV on the Oculus Quest 2 and 95° on Arpara VR All In One so neither stands out too much in this department but still offer great visuals when compared side-by-side.
In terms of cons between these two headsets, one thing that stood out was that while they both run on Android 10 operating system, only Oculus supports PC connectivity while Arpara does not yet have this feature implemented into their product (although may come with future updates). This could be seen as a major downside if you're looking for cross compatibility options between your PC and mobile devices. Also note that both are standalone devices meaning they need no extra sensors or hardware pieces like HTC Vive or Playstation VR systems require; this could be seen as either pro or con depending on user preferences for setup complexity versus portability/mobility needs.
All things considered I would say my personal preference lies with Oculus Quest 2 given its superior processing power combined with wider range of mobility options thanks to its roomscale tracking ability and connection options offered by native PC integration via its Android 10 OS operating system - plus all round solid features such as its 97 degree field of view and 1832 x 1920 px resolution make it a powerful device suitable for anyone who wants easy access to virtual reality content no matter where they are located.
Oculus Quest 2 | Arpara VR All In One | |
---|---|---|
Overview | ||
Brand | Meta | Arpara |
Model Name | Quest 2 | VR All In One |
Release Date | 13102020 | |
Country of Origin | United States | |
Category | Standalone VR | Standalone VR |
Battery Life | 3 h | |
Display | ||
Field of View | 97° | 95° |
Resolution | 1832 x 1920 px | 2560x2560 |
Refresh Rate | 72 Hz | 90 Hz |
Display Type | LCD | 2 x Micro-OLED binocular |
Sizing | ||
Weight | 503 g | 380g |
Dimensions | 192 x 102 x 143 mm | |
Features | ||
Room Scale? | YES | |
360 Tracking? | YES | |
Usable with Glasses? | YES | |
IPD Adjustment? | YES | |
USB? | YES | |
Bluetooth? | YES |