The Oculus Rift S and Lenovo Explorer are two popular virtual reality headsets that offer a wide variety of features for users to enjoy. Both headsets feature room scale tracking and 360-degree motion, but there are some differences between the two that must be taken into consideration before purchasing.

One of the main differences between the Oculus Rift S and the Lenovo Explorer is in terms of resolution. The Oculus Rift S features a resolution of 2560×1440 px while the Lenovo Explorer has a slightly higher resolution of 2880×1440 px. This means that with the Lenovo Explorer, you will get more detail in your VR experience than with the Oculus Rift S. This is definitely a pro for those looking for an immersive experience with great visuals.

Another key difference between these two VR headsets is in terms of field of view (FOV). The FOV on the Oculus Rift S measures at 115° while the FOV on the Lenovo Explorer measures at 110°. This might not seem like much of a difference but it could impact how immersed you feel when playing games or using other applications since it determines how much you can see around you without having to move your head too much or too little. In this case, I would consider this specification to be a con as I personally prefer wider fields of view so I can take in more information without moving my head as much as possible.

When it comes to refresh rate, however, both headsets have similar specifications - 80 Hz on the Oculus Rift S and 90 Hz on the Lenovo Explorer. Higher refresh rates usually lead to smoother gameplay experiences which can make all activities within VR far more enjoyable so both headsets do well here when compared to each other making this specification neutral instead of being either an advantage or disadvantage for one headset over another.

Finally, we must look at minimum CPU/GPU requirements needed by each headset before they can be used properly by consumers. On one hand we have Intel i3-6100 / AMD Ryzen 3 1200 processors required for use with Oculus Rift S while on other hand we have Intel Mobile Core i5 Dual-Core processor required for use with Lenovo Explorer . GPUs also differ: Nvidia GTX 1050Ti / AMD Radeon RX 470 minimum requirement for Facebook’s product and Intel HD Graphics 620 (GT2) graphics card required for Chinese product . When looking purely at specs alone here it seems clear that customers interested in either headset will need similarly powerful machines; although you may get away with lower specs if only watching movies or browsing internet etc., gamers who want top performance should look into getting something beefier regardless which model they choose –– making this specification almost irrelevant when choosing one headset over another from pure specs point-of-view..

Overall speaking after testing both products myself I personally preferLenovo’s offering due to its higher refresh rate giving me smoother gaming sessions plus its slightly wider field of view providing more visibility during intense moments; however final decision should come down user personal preferences and budget available - if spending power isn't constraint then deciding what suits best should go back primarily to display quality followed by refresh rate & field-of-view numbers provided above since most people would rather spend few extra bucks if resulting improved experience outweighs cost involved –– no matter whether they end up going with Facebook’sor Chinese company's solution..