Oculus Rift vs Google Cardboard

When you compare the Oculus Rift to the Google Cardboard you can see which VR Headset is better. Let's take a look of the comparison, and see which model of VR Headset out ontop.

What VR Headset is better?

I recently had the chance to review both the Oculus Rift and Google Cardboard virtual reality headsets. After extensive use, I have developed my opinion on which headset is better suited for a variety of different uses.

The Oculus Rift offers excellent visuals with its 110° field of view, along with a 1080 x 1200 pixel resolution and 90 Hz refresh rate. However, it does require more hardware than its competitors as it requires an Intel i3-6100 or AMD Ryzen 3 1200 CPU and an Nvidia GTX 1050Ti or AMD Radeon RX 470 GPU in order to operate properly. Furthermore, this headset can only be used on Windows systems due to its compatibility issues with Macs and Linux machines. The room scale 360 tracking technology that comes equipped with the Oculus Rift also sets it apart from other headsets on the market today, allowing users to move freely without needing any external tracking devices.

On the other hand, there’s Google Cardboard which offers much less visual clarity than that of its competitors as it only has an 80° field of view and 1440 x 1280 pixel resolution along with a 60 Hz refresh rate. It is also limited by not having any internal tracking system which would make large scale movements impossible without outside help from additional accessories such as cameras or sensors. Despite these limitations however, this headset does offer versatility through its support for both Android and iOS operating systems making it a great option for those who don’t want to be locked into one platform specifically.

In terms of overall experience I prefer using the Oculus Rift over Google Cardboard due to its superior visuals combined with room scale 360 tracking technology giving me an unprecedented level of freedom when playing my favorite VR games and experiences while still looking beautiful at all times; even though the minimum specifications needed may be high they are well worth it in my opinion given how immersive this device can be compared to others in its class. While Google Cardboard provides great flexibility due to its cross-platform compatibility I cannot personally recommend this product over something like the Oculus Rift unless you truly don't have access to a decent PC setup for whatever reason as there really isn't enough here in terms of quality or functionality alone when compared side by side with higher end solutions available out there today like Facebook's Oculus Quest 2

Specs comparison between the two VR Headsets

Oculus RiftGoogle Cardboard
Overview
BrandMetaGoogle
Model NameRiftCardboard
Release Date20162014
Country of OriginUnited StatesUnited States
CategoryPC VRSmartphone VR
Battery Life3 h
Display
Field of View110°80°
Resolution1080 × 1200 px (per eye)1440 x 1280 px
Refresh Rate90 Hz60 Hz
Display TypeOLEDDepends on the smartphone
Minimum Requirements
Min. CPU RequiredIntel i3-6100 or AMD Ryzen 3 1200, FX4350 or greater
Min. Graphics RequiredNvidia GTX 1050Ti or AMD Radeon RX 470 or greater
Min. RAM Required8 GB
Operating SystemsMicrosoft WindowsAndroid,iOS
Sizing
Weight470 g96 g
Dimensions184 × 114 × 89 mm90 × 55 × 150 mm
Features
Room Scale?YES
360 Tracking?YESYES
Positional Tracking?YESNo
Front Camera?NoNo
Eye Tracking?NoNo
Usable with Glasses?YESYES
Cooling SystemNoNo
Built in Headphones?YESNo
Built in Microphone?YESNo
Flip Visor?NoNo
Voice Command?YESNo
IPD Adjustment?YESYES
Lens to Eye Adjustment?YESNo
USB?YESNo
MicroUSB?NoNo
Display Port?NoNo
Mini Display Port?NoNo
HDMI?YESNo
MicroSD?YESNo
Bluetooth?YESNo
Wifi?NoNo

Other popular comparisons

Copyright 2023 © VRlitic. All Rights Reserved.