3.7

Comparing the two virtual reality headsets, it is easy to see that there are a few clear differences. The Lenovo Explorer offers a higher resolution of 2880 x 1440 pixels, while the PlayStation VR2 has only 2000x2040 pixels. This makes the Lenovo Explorer the better choice for those who want higher fidelity visuals in their experience.

The refresh rate of the Lenovo Explorer is 90 Hz, while that of the PlayStation VR2 is 120 Hz. A higher refresh rate ensures smoother movement and faster response times from user inputs, so this could be considered a pro for the PlayStation VR2 when compared to its competitor.

The minimum CPU required for use with each headset differs greatly; The Lenovo Explorer requires an Intel Mobile Core i5 Dual-Core with Hyperthreading, while the PlayStation VR2 does not require any specific CPU power as long as it can run on a console. This could be seen as an advantage for those who don’t have access to more powerful computing solutions, making it easier and more affordable to get into virtual reality gaming.

When it comes to room scale tracking and 360° capabilities both offer similar performance in this area; however, due to hardware limitations associated with consoles, some games may have reduced levels of accuracy or lower resolution textures than found on PC based solutions like what is offered by the Lenovo Explorer.

Ultimately, I would recommend going with whichever headset best suits your needs and budget. While I personally prefer the visuals offered by the Lenovo Explorer thanks to its higher resolution display and superior computing power requirements needed for smooth performance in many cases - if you’re looking at getting into virtual reality gaming on a budget then the PlayStation VR2 might be a better choice given its affordability and ease of setup associated with using a console system instead of having to build your own dedicated gaming PC.