When you compare the Samsung Odyssey to the Pico Neo 3 you can see which VR Headset is better. Let's take a look of the comparison, and see which model of VR Headset out ontop.
In this comparison of the Samsung Odyssey and Pico Neo 3, we will focus on their features, technical specifications and overall user experience.
Pros: The Samsung Odyssey is a PC VR headset, meaning it works with many of the latest Windows-based PCs that you might already have. It offers impressive 110° field of view and 1440 × 1600 px resolution for immersive visuals. Additionally, room scale technology allows for 360 tracking in a room space environment which gives you more freedom to move around within virtual reality. The refresh rate is also very smooth at 90 Hz for better stability and less latency while gaming or watching movies.
Cons: Its main downside lies in its minimum CPU requirements as it requires an Intel Core i5 processor along with Nvidia GTX1050 graphics card to run properly. This might make it too expensive for some users who do not own such powerful machines yet.
Pico Neo 3: Pros: Unlike the Samsung Odyssey, Pico Neo 3 does not require any external device as it stands alone thanks to its built-in Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 chipset that powers the system from within itself. Plus, it offers 98° field of view and 1832x1920 resolution making sure you get all necessary details when gaming or watching movies in VR mode. Furthermore, its refresh rate remains same at 90 Hz just like the Samsung Odyssey making sure there are no lags or stutters during your gaming sessions as well as other activities you may engage yourself in inside virtual reality world. Cons: Unfortunately, Pico Neo 3 lacks some features present in other standalone headsets such as inside-out tracking which means you don’t get full body movements captured accurately when using this particular device although some basic hand movement can still be recognized without much hassle unlike the rival Samsung Odyssey which has excellent 360-degree roomscale tracking capabilities giving users more realistic feel while navigating through various menus inside virtual world.. Verdict – Both headsets have their strengths and weaknesses but if I had to pick one between them then I would definitely go with Samsung Odyssey due to its superior specifications including more powerful processing power allowing smoother frame rates along with immersive field of view and excellent picture quality due to higher resolution provided by this headset compared to the other one mentioned here today - making it a better buy overall despite being slightly pricier than Pico Neo 3 when considering hardware specs alone!
|Samsung Odyssey||Pico Neo 3|
|Model Name||Odyssey||Neo 3|
|Country of Origin||South Korea|
|Category||PC VR||Standalone VR|
|Field of View||110°||98°|
|Resolution||1440 × 1600 px (per eye)||1832x1920|
|Refresh Rate||90 Hz||90 Hz|
|Display Type||AMOLED||Single LCD binocular|
|Min. CPU Required||Intel Core i5|
|Min. Graphics Required||Nvidia GTX1050|
|Min. RAM Required||8 GB|
|Operating Systems||Microsoft Windows|
|Dimensions||202 × 132 × 111 mm|
|Battery Life||4 h|
|Usable with Glasses?||YES|
|Built in Headphones?||YES|
|Built in Microphone?||YES|
|Lens to Eye Adjustment?||YES|
|Mini Display Port?||No|