When you compare the Samsung Gear VR to the Pico 4 you can see which VR Headset is better. Let's take a look of the comparison, and see which model of VR Headset out ontop.
When it comes to virtual reality headsets, two of the most popular choices are Samsung Gear VR and Pico 4. Both offer great features and have their own strengths and weaknesses that make them both good options for a user who is interested in exploring virtual reality. In this comparison, I’ll give my opinion on which one I think offers the best experience overall.
The first point of comparison between these two models is field of view. The Samsung Gear VR has a field of view of 101°, while the Pico 4 has a field of view of 105°. In this case, I would say that the larger field of view offered by the Pico 4 is definitely a pro for that device, as it offers users an even more immersive experience than what’s available from the Gear VR headset.
The resolution offered by each device is also something to consider when comparing them side-by-side. The Samsung Gear VR offers a resolution of 2560 x 1440 px, while the Pico 4 has a resolution of 2160x2160 pixels per inch (ppi). Once again here, I would say that higher ppi offered by the Pico 4 is definitely a pro for it as it provides users with an even sharper image than what’s available from the Gear VR headset.
Another important factor when looking at these two devices is their operating system compatibility and room scale capabilities. The Samsung Gear VR runs on Android and can be used in room scale applications if you have compatible hardware installed on your computer or smartphone device; however, unfortunately this feature isn't supported with all phones/devices so you may need to do some research before deciding whether or not this feature will work with your setup. On the other hand, while using standalone version such as Oculus Go or HTC Vive Focus+, PICO4 works with no external equipment required and supports various tracking systems including 6 DoF tracking and 3Dof tracking up to 5 meters range respectively – so no additional equipment needs to be purchased in order to enjoy room scale experiences either way both devices are well equipped for room-scale experiences but there's always extra equipment needed if you want to use any other additional sensors such as eye trackers etc..
Lastly we should look into refresh rate capability for each product:Samsung gear vr operates at 60 hz refresh rate ,on other hand pico4 operates at 90 hz . So in terms speed pico4 has slight advantage over samsung gearvr due its higher refresh rate although difference isn't significant enough unless user wants very smooth motion during fast paced game play otherwise difference won't be noticed much .
After considering all factors mentioned above ,I would personally prefer using pico4 because its slightly better performing then samsung gearvr due its higher ppi display ,field view &refresh rate along with easier accessibility since no additional hardware required apart from existing smartphone /computer unlike samsung gearvr which require specific smartphone model/computer depending upon model chosen .
|Samsung Gear VR||Pico 4|
|Model Name||Gear VR||Pico 4|
|Country of Origin||South Korea|
|Category||Smartphone VR||Standalone VR|
|Battery Life||3 h|
|Field of View||101°||105°|
|Resolution||2560 x 1440 px||2160x2160|
|Refresh Rate||60 Hz||90 Hz|
|Display Type||Display of inserted smartphone||2 x LCD binocular|
|Dimensions||207 × 121 × 99 mm|
|Usable with Glasses?||No|
|Built in Headphones?||No|
|Built in Microphone?||No|
|Lens to Eye Adjustment?||YES|
|Mini Display Port?||YES|